Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2400MHz vs 1650MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +126%
17.2 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX
1294
Arc A750 +70%
2200
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
3584
144
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
112
288
Tensor Cores
448
36
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

185W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy