Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +101%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Tonga
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy