NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+21622%
7.603 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT216
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
