Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +271%
7.603 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jul 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net