Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +7503%
7.603 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GF119
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy