Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1650MHz vs 1350MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 185W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX +22%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700
6.221 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX +113%
1294
Radeon Pro 5700
607
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2304
144
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.44 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.221 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
388.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Navi 10
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XLA
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy