Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +408%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy