Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (10GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1550MHz vs 1545MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +364%
11.07 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
24
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
DG1
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
754 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy