Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+764%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
