Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+18919%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
23W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G98
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
