Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+5861%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
