Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 78W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+1326%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
78W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
