Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+444%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
