Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +598%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy