Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+85%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GM204
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
