Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1950MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000
+308%
16.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
8
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU102
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
