Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+430%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
