Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +3354%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
256
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
142W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy