Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +6141%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N12M-Q3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy