CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+37211%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Quadro FX 470
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
256bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
C79
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
38W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
6
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy