Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1249%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy