Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +4365%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK208
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy