Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2050MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+786%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
47W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
