Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K620
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 NVIDIA Quadro K620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (2050MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1845%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Quadro K620

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
2
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
6
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Related News

1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy