Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2050MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+216%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
1920
256
TMUs
120
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
32
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
