Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 134% (2050MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +2394%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy