Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2050MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+110%
16.79 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
4096
Shading Units
3328
256
TMUs
104
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
32
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
12 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
