Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2050MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +94%
16.79 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
32
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net