Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+60%
22.22 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7168
Shading Units
7680
448
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
120
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
204 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
100 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
