Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
7120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+20474%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
7168
Shading Units
48
448
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
204 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
