Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1700MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
22.22 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+103%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Nov 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
7168
Shading Units
13312
448
TMUs
832
0
ROPs
0
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
204 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Generation 12.5
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
100 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
