Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
14328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+211519%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
96GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
14336
Shading Units
8
896
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
896
Tensor Cores
-
112
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
23W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
