Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

VS

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

16192 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages

Lower TDP (62W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +10822%

52.43 TFLOPS

Quadro 2000D

0.48 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Quadro 2000D

Graphics Card

Jan 2023

Release Date

Oct 2011

Data Center GPU

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 5.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz

Base Clock

-

1600 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1565 MHz

Memory Clock

650 MHz

Memory

128GB

Memory Size

1024MB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR5

8192bit

Memory Bus

128bit

3205GB/s

Bandwidth

41.60GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

4

-

Compute Units

-

16384

Shading Units

192

1024

TMUs

32

0

ROPs

16

1024

Tensor Cores

-

128

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per EU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

408 MB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s

Pixel Rate

5.000 GPixel/s

1638 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

20.00 GTexel/s

52.43 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

52.43 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

480.0 GFLOPS

52.43 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio

GPU Name

GF106

-

GPU Variant

GF106-875-KA-A1

Generation 12.5

Architecture

Fermi

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

10 nm

Process Size

40 nm

100 billion

Transistors

1.17 billion

1280 mm²

Die Size

238 mm²

Board Design

2400W

TDP

62W

2800 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

2x DVI

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

2.1

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

2

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

3

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

4

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

5

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

6

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

7

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA L40S

8

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

9

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

10

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD