Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
16336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+48446%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
16384
Shading Units
48
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
32W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
