Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+10688%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
16384
Shading Units
256
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
142W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
