Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
16256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +15053%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
16384
Shading Units
128
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
24
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

2400W
TDP
171W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net