Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+119059%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Dec 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
16384
Shading Units
16
1024
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
28W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
