Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
15744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +6039%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
640
1024
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
65W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy