CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+70751%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
VS
Quadro NVS 320M
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
16384
Shading Units
32
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
2400W
TDP
20W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
2
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
3
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
4
NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
5
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
6
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
7
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
8
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
9
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
10
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
2
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
4
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
5
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
6
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
7
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
9
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
10
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy