Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
16272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+18625%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
16384
Shading Units
112
1024
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
78W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
