Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1600MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
14464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+889%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
16384
Shading Units
1920
1024
TMUs
120
0
ROPs
64
1024
Tensor Cores
240
128
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
80W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
