ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+1169%
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
