ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
+806%
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
54.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
170W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF114
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
