Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
9608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 +33747%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
120
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
320W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
AD103
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy