Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600 +38%
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2011
FireGL
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

73W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cedar
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy