ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG
+8434%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2017
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
