Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +9684%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
475W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy