Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
520 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +1051%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Polaris 23
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy