Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +5873%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Fiji
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy