ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
4360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+6478%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
120
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GA100
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
